ĢƵ

close

According to Hofmann: Six degrees of coronavirus

By Mark Hofmann mhofmann@heraldstandard.Com 5 min read
article image -

We had a lot of cool things in the 1990s.

For example, we had a cloned sheep, sneakers with air pumps built into them for some reason and a cliffhanger at the very end of the decade called “Y2K” when we didn’t know if computers would shutdown and the world would end in the numeric transfer from 1999 to 2000. I won’t tell you kids if the world ended or not; my focus is on the 90s.

But the thing I remember best and didn’t have to look up on Wikipedia due to my poor memory is the game “Six Degrees of Kevin Bacon.”

The game was based on the theory of Six Degrees of Separation. That was boring until some college students added actor Kevin Bacon to it, which only goes to show that bacon and Bacon make everything better.

The way the game is played is you name any actor, and that actor can be linked through their film and TV roles to Kevin Bacon with no more than six steps or degrees.

I can even use myself as an example as what you’re about to read is true and backed up by the Internet Movie Database.

I played a doctor in an episode of 2011ĢƵ “George A. Romero Presents: Deadtime Stories;” actress Amy Lynn Best was in the same episode. She was also in the 2001 movie “The Resurrection Game” alongside actress Kristin Pfeifer, who was in a 2012 episode of “Parks and Recreation,” a show in which actor Chris Pratt co-starred. Pratt was in 2019ĢƵ “Avengers: End Game” with actor Benedict Cumberbatch, who was also in the 2015 movie “Black Mass” with Kevin Bacon.

So there: I’m five degrees separated from Kevin Bacon. If I had more time, I could probably find that I’m separated by four degrees, but my supervisor said spending five hours of my shift looking up actors and movies was more than enough time spent on a column.

That may be true, but the fact is I always wanted to do that, and it illustrates how to play my new game “Six Degrees of Coronavirus”.

The inspiration for the game came from the fact that if thereĢƵ one thing we humans are good at, itĢƵ avoiding and shifting blame.

Nothing has become a greater scapegoat for everything that happens to us than COVID-19 (and also the year 2020, but thatĢƵ another column for another time).

The purpose of the game is to link as many plausible steps to something that would normally get you in trouble, or at least invite scorn and shame from your family and friends, to coronavirus for you to save face or avoid a visit from law enforcement.

The game begins where you have to explain to someone or someone(s) your predicament, and try to link it to coronavirus as the root cause within six somewhat logical degrees of separation. Every time you use the word “because” or any similar phrasing, that counts as a point. The fewer number of points, the closer degree of separation to coronavirus and, therefore, a more plausible story. Any score over six, you lose and might as well fess up.

“Well, officer, I was in behind my neighborĢƵ house without pants because (1 point) I was running away from my house. The reason I did that (1 point) was from my wife walking in on me while I was going to the bathroom because (1 point) she needed to tell me she was in contact with someone who bumped into someone who knew someone who went to get tested for coronavirus and, because (1 point) that scared me, I ran out of my house like this.”

Four points. Not a great score, and, depending on his delivery, his prize could be a ride in a cop car.

“I didn’t mean to punch that mime in the face, your honor, but I did it because (1 point) he came right up to my face, and I panicked because (1 point) he may have had coronavirus and because (1 point) he really annoyed me because (1 point) he did the invisible rope trick inside the invisible box trick and that was being a pointless showoff (-2 points).”

Two points is a good score as negative points are purely subjective.

WhatĢƵ fun about this game is the interaction a player has with an opponent. The game can be played by both people even if they don’t know about the game.

So even if neither person is keeping score, the person doing the explaining has to sound reasonable and valid to the other person or people, and if all else fails, just add some bacon or even Bacon to the story for subjective negative points.

That’ll make it better.

According to Hofmann is written by staff reporter Mark Hofmann of Rostraver Township. His books, “Good Mourning! A Guide to Biting the Big One…and Dying, Too” and “Stupid Brain,” are available on Amazon.com. He co-hosts the “Locally Yours” radio show on WMBS 590 AM every Friday.

CUSTOMER LOGIN

If you have an account and are registered for online access, sign in with your email address and password below.

NEW CUSTOMERS/UNREGISTERED ACCOUNTS

Never been a subscriber and want to subscribe, click the Subscribe button below.

Starting at $4.79/week.