According to Hofmann: Scumbags of the silver screen: The Halloween edition
ItĢƵ Halloween weekend and if you just happen to be up late after sampling your childĢƵ trick-or-treat bag and on a six-hour sugar rush, you can always use that time to watch some movies that fit the mood of the season and seek out all the unintentional movie villains.
If you’re unfamiliar with unintentional movie villains, they aren’t blatantly evil like Michael Myers, Jason Voorhees, Freddy Krueger or the candy corn in your kidĢƵ trick-or-treat bag. However, they still cause havoc to the main character or characters through their actions.
The first unintentional villain is Mayor Vaughn from the movie “Jaws.”
You may think the villain of the movie is the shark, but when you get down to it, the shark is an animal that is hungry and is just doing whatĢƵ in its nature.
The real problem is the shark eating people near a beach of a popular tourist destination. An even bigger problem is the mayor of that town not wanting to close the beach, a.k.a. the smorgasbord of humanity.
I can somewhat see his point as the town relies on tourist dollars to survive, plus, the odds of the shark attack victims being registered voters is low, so whatĢƵ the harm?
What also makes the guy kind of villainous is the scene where people are on the beach, but avoiding the ocean, and then the mayor eggs some guy and his family into going into the water to get others to do the same.
Oh, I see, Mr. Mayor, you don’t need to risk your hide, but get others to do your dirty work.
He also takes no responsibility when things do go wrong.
For example, he stands around like a plank of wood when the mother of a victim slaps Chief Brody across the face for not closing the beach before her son became a shark snack.
I normally don’t yell at the TV until it actually starts arguing with me, but that scene makes me do it every time as Brody was the one begging the idiot mayor to close the beach in the first place with the mayor constantly refusing to do so.
While heĢƵ bad, heĢƵ nothing compared to Tinkerbell from the original animated “Peter Pan.”
Yes, I know “Peter Pan” isn’t classified as a Halloween movie, but keep in mind that itĢƵ Disney from the 1950s where kids were tough and could take some disturbing things that would make the pansies of today crawl into a safe space and suck their thumbs … and I’m referring to some adults as well as kids.
If you don’t believe me, stream a Disney movie made earlier than 1985, and it will likely come with a content warning.
Now, back to Tinkerbell, who could have had a starring role in the movie “Fatal Attraction” with her obsession and jealousy over Peter Pan.
For example, Tinkerbell sets her sights on Wendy as Peter brings her to Neverland, and the fatal fairy convinces the Lost Boys that Peter wants them to shoot Wendy.
Peter Pan banishes the little psychopath, and then Captain Hook manipulates her insane jealousy in revealing the location of PeterĢƵ hideout for an attack.
Sure, she redeems herself at the end of the movie, but, if I were Peter, from that point on, I’d check to see if Tink swapped her pixie dust for angel dust and fly while wearing a parachute.
Now, this last one actually pains me to write, and I didn’t want to believe it when I read it online because “Ghostbusters” is one of my favorite movies of all time, but the more I thought about it, the more it made sense.
The Ghostbusters themselves are (to a certain degree) the unintentional movie villains in the original “Ghostbusters”.
The writing was slimed on the wall during the elevator scene when Peter Venkman responded to Ray StantzĢƵ concerns that they didn’t have a successful test of their proton packs.
“Why worry? Each of us is carrying an unlicensed nuclear accelerator on his back,” Venkman says.
Yeah, I’d say that was the red flag that these guys, while their hearts were in the right place, weren’t exactly on the up and up.
That becomes clear when Walter Peck with the Environmental Protection Agency comes into the picture and questions the Ghostbusters on the potentially dangerous containment unit in the basement, wanting to know exactly what they have down there.
Peck is seen as The Man getting in the way of the Ghostbusters (which he is), and he also causes the containment unit to breach, sending thousands of captured ghosts free on the city.
As slimy (pun intended) of a guy Peck is, heĢƵ shown to be absolutely correct in his concerns.
However, I do think if the Ghostbusters went through the proper legal channels and regulations when designing and building their equipment, and building their ghost-busting business, the same results would have happened in the movie, and they would have appeared less unethical.
Of course, if they waited for the government red tape to clear, it would have lengthened the movieĢƵ runtime to roughly 29 hours, so some corners had to be cut.
So if that means some of my most beloved characters have to be seen as scumbags of the silver screen to make one of my favorite movies of all time happen, then so be it.
And if that leaves a bad taste in your mouth, well, at least it wasn’t candy corn.
According to Hofmann is written by staff reporter Mark Hofmann of Rostraver Township. His books, “Good Mourning! A Guide to Biting the Big One … and Dying, Too” and “Stupid Brain,” are available on Amazon.com.

